The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a new under-the-skin form of isatuximab-irfc called Sarclisa Escena, given either as a shot or through a hands-free injector, for certain adults with multiple myeloma. The approval gives people a faster way to receive a medicine that was previously given through an intravenous (IV) infusion and required a trip to an infusion center.
For people living with multiple myeloma, treatment may involve regular, lengthy visits to a clinic or infusion center. The under-the-skin option may be given at a doctor’s office, and time needed to receive treatment can be a matter of minutes instead of over an hour. It also can reduce some reactions related to IV administration for some people, such as chills, breathing problems, nausea, or blood pressure changes.
Still, the best treatment and delivery method will depend on each person’s health, treatment history, and preferences.
How Does Under-the-Skin Sarclisa Compare With IV Sarclisa?The FDA based the approval in part on the phase 3 IRAKLIA clinical trial. The study included 531 adults with multiple myeloma who’d received previous treatment.
Everyone in the study received Sarclisa with pomalidomide and dexamethasone. Half received Sarclisa under the skin with the on-body injector, and half received it through an IV infusion. Researchers wanted to determine whether the under-the-skin version worked at least as well as the IV version.
The overall response rate was:
The overall response rate is the percentage of people whose cancer became smaller or showed another defined response to treatment. The findings showed that the under-the-skin method produced a response rate similar to that of IV Sarclisa.
Previous phase 2 trials also found high response rates with under-the-skin Sarclisa in both relapsed or refractory and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
The under-the-skin method also requires significantly less administration time than an IV infusion:
Like other cancer treatments, Sarclisa Escena can cause side effects. Side effects may vary depending on which medicines are used with the treatment.
The most common side effects listed in the prescribing information include:
Common blood test changes include lower levels of platelets, hemoglobin, and certain white blood cells. These white blood cells include neutrophils, which help fight infection, and lymphocytes, which play a role in the immune system.
Sarclisa Escena may also cause serious reactions during or after the injection, low neutrophil levels, infections, and second cancers. It may interfere with some blood and multiple myeloma monitoring tests and can harm a developing fetus.
Because Sarclisa Escena is injected under the skin, injection-site reactions may occur. People receiving treatment should tell their healthcare team about any new or worsening symptoms.
Multiple myeloma treatment often continues over many cycles and may require frequent appointments. The time, travel, and physical demands involved can affect daily life for people with myeloma and their caregivers.
The approval of under-the-skin Sarclisa doesn’t introduce a new active drug. Instead, it offers another way to receive an established treatment. Clinical trial results suggest that this approach provides a response rate similar to IV Sarclisa, while potentially reducing the time needed to receive each dose and lowering the chance of systemic (whole-body) reactions related to treatment administration.
Not every treatment works equally well for everyone. If you’re not getting the results you’d hoped for, are experiencing difficult side effects, or find your treatment schedule hard to manage, consider speaking with your healthcare team. They can review your personal response, overall health, treatment goals, and available options before deciding whether any change to the treatment plan is appropriate.
Join the ConversationOn MyMyelomaTeam, people share their experiences with myeloma, get advice, and find support from others who understand.
How satisfied are you with your current treatment plan? Let others know in the comments below.
Get updates directly to your inbox.
Become a member to get even more
This is a member-feature!
Sign up for free to view article comments.
Last week this site passed on a study of particular interest to me. The research focused on whether or not there is an advantage to keep persons in remission on treatment. Two groups of patients in… read more
We'd love to hear from you! Please share your name and email to post and read comments.
You'll also get the latest articles directly to your inbox.